INTRODUCTION

This discussion paper has been prepared as a part of ongoing research into an appropriate 21 Century governance models for museums with the Queen Victoria Museum & Art Gallery as an institution being a case study for museum governance in a more general way. An important issue that needs clarification is the one of ownership.

Launceston City Council (LCC) asserts that it “owns and operates the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery”. This assertion is contestable in 'law and lore' and there seems to be a considerable body of opinion that would fundamentally challenge this LCC assertion.

Before a 21st C mode of governance can be found the question of ‘ownership/s’ needs to be addressed in order to establish an institution's chain of accountability. Given this museum’s history, its ownership has become blurred along with many other aspects of the institution’s governance and management.

Readers are encouraged to participate in this aspect of the research. The simplest way of doing so is to add a comment in the section provided below each section of the paper. Alternatively readers may email QVMAGresearch@7250.net to either make a written submission or to arrange a confidential interview with a member of the QVMAG Working Group if that is required.

There is now a companion paper to this one ... click here to access it

Ray Norman Nov. 2010

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Ownership and Marketing

At the 2002 QVMAG Search Conference governance and marketing were identified as the two issues for the museum that were most in need of urgent attention. For a myriad of reasons, not the least the machinations of Local Government politics, neither have received the kind of attention flagged as being needed at the conference.


Given that marketing is the process by which organisations generate audience interest, and here, engage communities with their services, it is something that a museum's management is obliged to address in the 21st Century. It is the management strategy that underlies the operation's development and legitimises it. It is an integrated process through which organisations build strong community relationships and creates value for their Communities of Ownership and Interest (COI).


Interestingly the QVMAG Search Conference was a three day affair attended by people who self selected to attend and were clearly members of the institution's COI. That they did so and collectively identified these two issues is not insignificant – even eight years on


At the time non-residents were being charged a $10 entry fee, attendances were falling and the recurrent costs of the institution were rising – and have done since. Despite the outcomes of this conference and the Chamberlain  Report that was commissioned by Council following the conference, and that advocated change for the QVMAG, the institution is in essence currently trying to address the same set of issues as before 2002 – albeit stimulated by a different set of circumstances.

Clearly this history has inhibited the effectiveness of the QVMAG's marketing. The 2002 Search Conference was in fact a demonstration of the levels of,  the diversity of and the passionately asserted ownerships and interests people had invested in the institution. It was also a pointer to the unrealised outcomes and the missed opportunities the museum's governance, and consequently its marketing needs that are yet to be addressed as comprehensively in 2010 as it was identified that it needed to be in 2002. Ultimately this is a failure of governance.

INDEX

The Ownership of the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery and its Collections – click here

The QVMAG and the Tasmanian Local Government Act 1993 click here

The QVMAG‘s Community of Ownership and Interest – click here

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I fear the QVMAG may have been following the sides of the Scabble dice rather than the top surface...